| 陈一文 作者：迈克尔•安东尼奥 约翰•法甘 克莱尔•罗宾森 陈一文 翻译 沈阳 校对 营养学教授、分子生物学家与作者玛丽昂•耐斯利(Marion Nestle)就欧洲、美国转基因工程师撰写的综述报告《转基因神话及其真相》一文给了高度评价，她写道：“这是距今为止我所见到的批评转基因食品问题方面研究、充分综述的最好报告。转基因的支持者能否提出同样好研究、综合性与有说服力的报告？我对此表示怀疑，但希望他们也能够做出同样的努力。此外，这份报告也给出需要将转基因食品零售实行标识提供足够的理由。以便于消费者有知情权作出选择。” 为此，我们提议大家（无论支持、反对或者不甚了解转基因食品的人士）认真思考、读一下“《转基因神话及其真相》30个新闻要点”一文，本文之后还会逐项详细介绍的后续各篇。 原文：Professor of nutrition, molecular biologist and author Marion Nestle has praised the new report, GMO Myths and Truths (see above), in her blog, saying, "This is the best-researched and most comprehensive review I've seen of the criticisms of GM foods. Can the pro-GM advocates produce something equally well researched, comprehensive, and compelling? I doubt it but I'd like to see them try. In the meantime, this report provides plenty of justification for the need to label GM foods. Consumers have the right to choose. To do that, we need to know." For this reason, recommend all individuals, regardless those support, argue against or not so familiar to GM foods, carefully consider the 30 points of the report listed below, as well as the following papers giving detailed explanation to each of the points. Dr Michael Antoniou 《转基因神话及其真相》的作者：迈克尔•安东尼奥博士(Michael Antoniou)是分子遗传学研究者，英国国王学院伦敦医学院基因表达与疗法负责人。 原文：Michael Antoniou, PhD, is reader in molecular genetics and head, Gene Expression and Therapy Group, King’s College London School of Medicine, London, UK. Dr John Fagan 约翰•法甘博士是食物系统可持续、生物安全与转基因生物检测方面领先有权威学者。他创立了“全球ID集团”并担任首席科学家，这家公司及其子公司从事转基因生物食品检测与“无转基因”认证业务。他亦担任《地球开放式资源》的主任。更早，他在美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）从事癌症学术研究。约翰•法甘是康奈尔大学生物化学与分子和细胞生物学博士。 原文：John Fagan, PhD, is a leading authority on sustainability in the food system, biosafety, and GMO testing. He is founder and chief scientific officer of Global ID Group, a company with subsidiaries involved in GMO food testing and GMO-free certification. He is a director of Earth Open Source. Earlier, he conducted cancer research at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and in academia. He holds a PhD in biochemistry and molecular and cell biology from Cornell University. Claire Robinson 克莱尔•罗宾森，《地球开放式资源》研究部主任。她是一位具有公共健康、科学与政策，环境领域调查性报告与交流方面背景的医学博士。 原文：Claire Robinson, MPhil, is research director at Earth Open Source. She has a background in investigative reporting and the communication of topics relating to public health, science and policy, and the environment. 有关《欧美基因工程师最新报告：为什么说转基因食品有危险？》作者更多介绍参见原文出处介绍 原文：“Why genetically engineered food is dangerous – New report by genetic engineers” provides more introductions to the authors: 《转基因神话及其真相》30个新闻要点 (30 news points from the report “GMO Myths and Truths”) 1. 农作物品种培育过程使用转基因工程是一项不精确、或者说不可预料、缺乏安全性保障的技术。这种技术能导致所产的食物中形成对人畜有害毒素或者成为致敏原，更为可怕的是，现在尚未有足够的监测手段找到这些危险因子。 原文：Genetic engineering as used in crop development is not precise or predictable and has not been shown to be safe. The technique can result in the unexpected production of toxins or allergens in food that are unlikely to be spotted in current regulatory checks. 2. 有证据显示，包括已经进入我们人类食品与畜禽饲料食物链供应的一些转基因农作物品种，在动物喂食试验中有明显毒害效果，主要是干扰肝功能、肾功能以及破坏正常的免疫反应。 原文：GM crops, including some that are already in our food and animal feed supply, have shown clear signs of toxicity in animal feeding trials – notably disturbances in liver and kidney function and immune responses. 3. 转基因支持者们以“非生物学相关/显著”为理由不认可这些达到统计学“显著”差异的临床发现，他们的论据是在现有科学理论上站不住脚。 原文：GM proponents have dismissed these statistically significant findings as “not biologically relevant/significant”, based on scientifically indefensible arguments. 4. 欧盟动物饲料委员会曾经进行某种转基因食品与转基因作物做了临床试验，其结果被转基因支持者声称都是安全的。然后，经过对这些临床研究的事实再审核时发现：喂食转基因饲料动物同不喂食转基因饲料对照动物之间，健康状况存在令人不安的统计学显著差异。 原文：Certain EU-commissioned animal feeding trials with GM foods and crops are often claimed by GM proponents to show they are safe. In fact, examination of these studies shows significant differences between the GM-fed and control animals that give cause for concern. 5.距今为止,尚未在人群中组织转基因食品安全性试验，但从极为有限的几项研究数据显示，人体食用转基因食品安全性存在令人担心的问题。 原文： GM foods have not been properly tested in humans, but the few studies that have been carried out in humans give cause for concern. 6. 美国食品及药物管理局（FDA）并不要求转基因作物进行强制性安全试验，甚至不评估转基因作物的安全性问题，而只是对转基因作物“解除监管”，依据是转基因生物技术公司保证转基因作物与非转基因对应作物“实质等同”！“实质等同”如此说词缺乏严谨的科学证据支持,这就好比说患有疯牛病（BSE）的牛与未患疯牛病的牛也“实质等同”一样，因而告诉大家：“疯牛病牛可以安全食用！”的道理。 原文： The US FDA does not require mandatory safety testing of GM crops, and does not even assess the safety of GM crops but only “deregulates” them, based on assurances from biotech companies that they are “substantially equivalent” to their non-GM counterparts. This is like claiming that a cow with BSE is substantially equivalent to a cow that does not have BSE and is thus safe to eat! Claims of substantial equivalence cannot be justified on scientific grounds. 7. 美国几乎不建立转基因食品监管体系。美国人不对转基因食品安全性进行评估，法规也不要求在超市销售的转基因食品加上标识。但在世界其他地区的政府，都在政策上要求销售转基因食品必须加上标识，提醒公众食用转基因食品对身体健康潜在有害影响。 原文： The regulatory regime for GM foods is weakest in the US, where GM foods do not even have to be assessed for safety or labelled in the marketplace, but in most regions of the world regulations are inadequate to protect people’s health from the potential adverse effects of GM foods. 8. 欧盟区各国对转基因食物与饲料采用较为严格的监管制度，包括，进入欧盟区市场前必须进行安全性试验。问题出在这种安全性试验是由转基因食物与饲料的商业公司自己进行，这种监管制度形同虚设。 原文：In the EU, where the regulatory system is often claimed to be strict, minimal pre-market testing is required for a GMO and the tests are commissioned by the same companies that stand to profit from the GMO if it is approved – a clear conflict of interest. 9. 全球的转基因食品与饲料监管制度都存在一个漏洞，即不要求在动物或者人群中进行转基因食品与饲料长期毒理学试验。 原文：No long-term toxicological testing of GMOs on animals or testing on humans is required by any regulatory agency in the world. 10. 转基因生物技术公司利用专利条款及知识产权保护法律政策，限制独立研究者为研究目的获得转基因作物材料。造成转基因产业以外的独立科学家难以将转基因与非转基因作物（食品及饲料）安全性研究所得到的研究结果备受限制。此外，那些坚持从事转基因生物安全性研究工作的科学家也一直担心，会遭到来自转基因产业有组织地抵毁声誉活动的攻击。 原文：Biotech companies have used patent claims and intellectual property protection laws to restrict access of independent researchers to GM crops for research purposes. As a result, limited research has been conducted on GM foods and crops by scientists who are independent of the GM industry. Scientists whose work has raised concerns about the safety of GMOs have been attacked and discredited in orchestrated campaigns by GM crop promoters. 11. 大部分转基因作物（超过75%）必须喷洒除草剂才能表达功能。但凡种植这种转基因作物的地方，都因此造成除草剂的使用量大幅度增加。 原文：Most GM crops (over 75%) are engineered to tolerate applications of herbicides. Where such GM crops have been adopted, they have led to massive increases in herbicide use. 12. 称为“农达（Roundup）”的草甘膦除草剂，是全球种植超过50%转基因作物激活功能的惟一除草剂，临床报告已经证明，它并不像厂商所宣传的那样安全或者对人畜有益，在动物试验中发现“农达”能引致畸形（先天性缺陷）、造成生殖障碍、引致DNA损伤与癌症。在人群流行病学研究中则发现：草甘膦除草剂 “农达”与流产、出生缺陷、初生儿神经发育障碍、DNA损伤，以及同几种癌症发病率相关。 原文：Roundup, the herbicide that over 50% of all GM crops are engineered to tolerate, is not safe or benign as has been claimed but has been found to cause malformations (birth defects), reproductive problems, DNA damage, and cancer in test animals. Human epidemiological studies have found an association between Roundup exposure and miscarriage, birth defects, neurological development problems, DNA damage, and certain types of cancer. 13. 在南美洲,种植转基因大豆地区已经发生公共健康危机，那里的民众因为长期暴露于喷洒到（抗除草剂转基因）作物上的草甘膦除草剂“农达”，还有其他农用化学品，临床报告显示：当地初生婴儿生理缺陷与民众癌症发病率逐年升高。 原文：A public health crisis has erupted in GM soy-producing regions of South America, where people exposed to spraying with Roundup and other agrochemicals sprayed on the crop report escalating rates of birth defects and cancer. 14. 大重的研究报告证明草甘膦除草剂“农达”同农作物疾病，尤其是镰刀霉菌感染增加有关，这是一种引起大豆落叶的真菌病，吃了患有此病的饲料和食品也会令人畜引发中毒症状。 原文：A large number of studies indicate that Roundup is associated with increased crop diseases, especially infection with Fusarium, a fungus that causes wilt disease in soy and can have toxic effects on humans and livestock. 15.植入杀虫基因Bt(校者注：苏云金杆菌 Bacillus thuringiensis 的缩写)的转基因作物并不能减少持续使用农药的数量，仅仅是改变除草剂杀虫药效：将原先喷洒到农作物外表上，变成由农作物体液产生作用。 原文： Bt insecticidal GM crops do not sustainably reduce pesticide use but change the way in which pesticides are used: from sprayed on, to built in. 16.持续使用草甘膦除草剂“农达”时间延长，作物害虫已产生了能耐受杀虫基因Bt毒素的抗药性，新一代耐杀虫基因Bt毒素的作物害虫再次横行越来，事实证明杀虫转基因Bt技术不可能持续有效。 原文： Bt technology is proving unsustainable as pests evolve resistance to the toxin and secondary pest infestations are becoming common. 17.转基因支持者宣称，转入转基因作物的 Bt(苏云金杆菌)成份对人畜并非毒素，不论是传统种植的农民还是有机种植的农民都在长期喷洒使用，经过长期使用证明它们是安全的天然成分。但是，转基因形式的Bt(苏云金杆菌)毒性与在自然环境下的Bt(苏云金杆菌)毒性确实有很大差别，转基因形式的Bt会出现不同程度的毒性且引起过敏症状。 原文：GM proponents claim that the Bt toxin engineered into GM plants is safe because the natural form of Bt, long used as a spray by conventional and organic farmers, has a history of safe use. But the GM forms of Bt toxins are different from the natural forms and could have different toxic and allergenic effects. 18. 转基因Bt毒素的毒性不限于对有害昆虫。在实验动物毒性喂食试验中，已经发现转基因Bt(苏云金杆菌)作物对实验动物有毒性作用。 原文：GM Bt toxin is not limited in its toxicity to insect pests. GM Bt crops have been found to have toxic effects on laboratory animals in feeding trials. 19. 已经发现转基因Bt(苏云金杆菌)作物在环境中产生的毒性并非仅限于有害昆虫，其毒性呈现为无特定靶性（non-target）生物目标。 原文：GM Bt crops have been found to have toxic effects on non-target organisms in the environment. 20. 在加拿大,科学家已经发现怀孕妇女的循环血液、以及供给她的胎儿血液中找到转基因Bt(苏云金杆菌)，它们在孕妇消化过程中并未象正常食物那样被彻底分解，呈现有毒结构状态。 原文：Bt toxin is not fully broken down in digestion and has been found circulating in the blood of pregnant women in Canada and in the blood supply to their foetuses. 21. 农田免耕耕作方法促进转基因作物使用抗虫除草剂，其中免耕必须伴随使用除草剂来控制杂草生长，这比用耕作办法上的作物土壤微气候差。对深层土壤碳含量检测证实，免耕法土壤远不及经耕耘农田储碳多。 原文：The no-till method of farming promoted with GM herbicide-tolerant crops, which avoids ploughing and uses herbicides to control weeds, is not more climate-friendly than ploughing. No-till fields do not store more carbon in the soil than ploughed fields when deeper levels of soil are measured. 22. 因为使用除草剂，免耕法农田土壤耕作环境反而恶化。 原文：No-till increases the negative environmental impacts of soy cultivation, because of the herbicides used.
| 
4116
2
